marinePRACTICE HUB
Study portal

Cargo claims: evidence, surveys and the documents that matter

Build a cargo claim file that explains condition, cause, insured interest and loss, with a worked damage schedule and practical distinctions about recovery.

Foundation 7 min read
An opened cargo crate is inspected alongside photographs, a measuring rule and a record of the goods’ condition.
Condition records, photographs and inspection findings help establish the damage and its amount. Cause and insurance cover require their own assessment.
Independent marine education
Updated
On this page
THE ESSENTIAL IDEA

A useful cargo claim file connects the goods, their journey and condition with the insured interest and a supported loss calculation. Photographs, surveys and invoices answer different questions; none replaces the policy or proves carrier liability on its own.

What you will learn

  • Connect the main cargo documents with the questions they help answer.
  • Distinguish mitigation, survey findings, loss measurement and acceptance of cover.
  • Prepare an illustrative loss schedule without confusing it with an agreed insurance payment.

Tell the story of the goods before presenting the total

A receiver sends an invoice and three photographs of wet cases. They show that something has gone wrong, but leave important questions unanswered: which packages were affected, when were they opened, what condition was recorded on delivery and what can still be repaired?

A cargo claim file should make that sequence understandable. It connects an insured interest and journey with evidence of loss, while allowing the insurer to examine cause, scope and amount. A carrier claim may run alongside it under different contracts and rules.

For the broader stages, read the marine claims process. This guide concentrates on the evidence and calculation behind a goods claim.

Record delivery condition precisely

Count the packages and record visible damage or shortages against the relevant delivery documents. A specific observation is more useful than a general reservation. For example, “three cases wet at the base, one side panel broken” records more than “goods received damaged”.

Photographs should connect the condition to identifiable goods. Wider views can show the container, vehicle or stowage arrangement; closer views can show packing, marks and damage. Keep original images and note who took them, when and where. An isolated close-up may not establish which shipment it concerns.

An apparently sound outer case does not prove that its contents are undamaged. If a problem is discovered on unpacking, record the opening, the internal condition and the chronology. A delivery reservation is evidence and may have legal significance, but it is not the same as commencing proceedings or satisfying every contractual notice requirement.

Build an evidence file around the questions

The purpose of a document matters more than ticking its name off a list. Insurers’ published cargo instructions commonly ask for several of the following, with additional material depending on the goods and incident.

Question Useful records What needs checking
What cover is involved? Policy, certificate, declarations and endorsements Insured party, goods, journey and terms
What was shipped? Invoice, packing list, weights and package marks Quantities, identity and value basis
Who carried or held it? Bill of lading, waybill, storage and forwarding terms Contracting parties and the agreed movement
When did the condition change? Delivery receipts, handover records, photographs and outturn information Dates, quantities and the distinction between observed and assumed condition
What caused the loss and how extensive is it? Survey, inspection, technical or quality reports Examination scope, findings and remaining uncertainty
What can be recovered or repaired? Repair quotes, test results and retained-value evidence Technical suitability and supported costs
What has been done to protect the claim? Notifications, correspondence and mitigation records Recipients, timing, decisions and preservation of rights

A complete transport document includes relevant terms as well as its face. A repair quotation should identify the affected items and work proposed. Where one document corrects an earlier record, explain the correction and preserve the chronology.

Identify the insured interest and the relevant transit

The commercial invoice alone does not settle who can recover under the insurance. The sale arrangements, claimant’s capacity and insurance document need to fit together. Under the identified 2009 Institute Cargo Clauses, insurable interest at the time of loss is an express requirement.

The journey also needs evidence. Movement records can show whether the goods were still in ordinary transit, had reached final storage or had been diverted into another arrangement. Discovery after arrival does not necessarily establish that the damage occurred after arrival; equally, it does not prove damage happened during the insured journey.

These are coverage enquiries, not matters resolved simply by attaching a survey. Cargo insurance explained connects insured interest, value and transit in more detail.

Use the survey to establish facts, not to assume payment

An inspection may address the nature, cause and extent of damage, possible repair and remaining value. Depending on the appointment, it can involve sampling, opening packages, testing or technical specialists. Its scope and limitations should be recorded.

Separate observation from interpretation. Corrosion on a component is an observation; an opinion about when and why it developed requires supporting reasoning. A report should make clear which goods were examined and whether its conclusions can reasonably be extended to unexamined units.

The surveyor’s attendance does not itself accept cover or establish the carrier’s legal liability. Where a joint survey is appropriate, interested parties can preserve a common physical record while retaining different positions on responsibility.

Mitigate further damage while preserving useful evidence

Wet packing, contamination or continuing deterioration may require action. Depending on the goods, suitable measures can include segregation, reconditioning, repacking, testing or repair. Coordinate with the insurer and relevant specialists under the actual arrangements, while addressing urgent safety and deterioration concerns.

Keep enough evidence to explain the original damage and the reason for action. Record what was separated, changed, disposed of or sold, together with authorisation, quantities and costs. Leaving every damaged item untouched can allow avoidable deterioration; disposing of everything before it can be examined can destroy important evidence.

A salvage sale here means realising an appropriate residual value from damaged goods, where suitable and permitted. It is different from maritime salvage services that save property from danger at sea. The method, proceeds and associated costs need a clear record, and reasonable mitigation expenditure is still assessed under the applicable insurance terms.

Worked example: a loss schedule for wet machinery parts

The shipment and figures below are invented. A delivery contains 100 cases, each with an assumed goods value of £2,000 for this exercise. Twenty cases are affected. Inspection supports repair of twelve at £600 each; the other eight are assumed uneconomic to repair and have an estimated net sale value of £200 each.

Assume £1,000 of documented protective handling is included in this working estimate. The schedule is prepared before insurance deductibles, limits, valuation adjustments, tax treatment or any decision on cover.

Working item Basis Amount
Repairable cases 12 × £600 £7,200
Other affected cases 8 × £2,000 £16,000
Less estimated net residual proceeds 8 × £200 −£1,600
Protective handling Assumed supported cost £1,000
Working total £7,200 + £16,000 − £1,600 + £1,000 £22,600

The invoice value of the twenty affected cases is £40,000, but that does not make £40,000 the measured loss. The full shipment value of £200,000 is a different figure again.

The £22,600 total is an illustrative working estimate, not an agreed payment formula. Each assumption requires support, including the repair assessment, value basis, residual proceeds and treatment of costs. If a quotation already allowed for residual value, deducting that value again would double count it.

Preserve the carrier claim while the insurance enquiry continues

Report the insurance claim under the policy’s actual requirements and separately address notices and rights against carriers or other custodians. Keep their responses. The fact that goods are insured does not remove the need to protect a possible recovery.

Policy reporting, carrier notice and legal time bars can involve different requirements. Do not assume that ongoing correspondence, survey arrangements or an insurer’s acknowledgement extends a deadline. The particular contracts, mode of transport, law and any valid extension matter.

After a covered first-party settlement, an insurer may exercise the cargo interest’s rights through subrogation. It takes those rights with their relevant limitations and defences; the payment does not establish fault. A clear evidence file therefore supports both the insurance investigation and any properly pursued recovery.

EXAM PREPARATION

Preparing for P&IQ or ICS?

Build on what you have learned with structured P&IQ and ICS study, question practice and mock exams.

Explore exam preparation